When Renewal Savings Were at Risk of Missing Open Enrollment
Jul 20, 2026
A California law firm with 125 employees had long relied on the same HRIS and benefits administration platform. As its January renewal approached, the firm identified medical plan and ancillary carrier changes that could reduce costs. Then the platform provider said it could not complete the renewal build in time for open enrollment.
That turned a cost-saving strategy into an execution problem. Without a workable alternative, the firm would have had to keep less favorable plans, absorb a higher renewal increase, and pay added fees to make changes in the existing system. The gap was clear: the incumbent platform could not move on the client’s timeline.
When open enrollment was at risk, execution became just as important as strategy.
IMA’s HR technology and service team acted to support the client by:
IMA could move quickly because the team controlled the platform and the implementation support. Instead of waiting on a third party with rigid deadlines, the client had a coordinated team handling the build, integrations, and questions directly. The client also saw a clear improvement in responsiveness during the process.
This case shows that renewal strategy and benefits technology cannot be treated separately. IMA helped the client preserve planned savings by pairing broker guidance with a practical platform solution and fast execution when the original system could not deliver.
The firm made the plan and carrier changes it wanted, realizing the savings on their renewal, as well as eliminating outside costs for benefits administration and electronic files to carriers, totaling approximately $40,000 in year one. It also moved to a more responsive support model with streamlined enrollment and payroll processes.