Understanding and Overcoming Proximity Bias in Hybrid Workplaces
Nov 3, 2023
In the rapidly evolving employment landscape, where remote and hybrid workplaces have become increasingly prevalent, the concept of proximity bias has emerged as a critical challenge to address. Proximity bias refers to people’s inherent tendency to favor individuals who are physically closer to them in a workplace setting, often at the expense of remote or distributed team members. As more organizations embrace flexible work arrangements, potential inequalities between remote and in-office employees are a leading concern.
As more workplaces adopt hybrid work models, organizations and HR professionals will need to make a more concerted effort to recognize and mitigate proximity bias.
Proximity bias is the concept that employees in close physical proximity to their team and company leaders will be favored and perceived as better workers than their remote counterparts. Furthermore, proximity bias may occur against employees who do not have frequent contact with leadership or work during peak business hours.
More professionals are recognizing that such a cognitive bias does, in fact, exist. A 2023 Executive Network report found that 62% of HR leaders and 70% of business leaders agreed there is likely proximity bias toward the in-person workforce. A key driver of proximity bias is the assumption that people are more productive in an on-site work environment than at home or other remote locations.
Those on the receiving end of proximity bias may feel neglected or not appreciated or valued in the workplace. They may also receive less support and miss opportunities that their peers receive. As a result, these employees may be discouraged and less engaged than other employees. In today’s tight labor market, employers can’t afford to lose remote and hybrid workers due to proximity bias or resulting poor workplace culture.
Proximity bias can occur at all levels of an organization—including in companywide offerings from leadership and the HR department as well as in interpersonal relationships among supervisors, managers, and employees. Here are common examples of proximity bias:
Supervisors and employees may not realize they are giving preferential treatment to on-site employees, so it’s crucial to be aware of situations where bias can occur. Then, employees can make a conscious effort not to treat others differently based on their work location.
Organizations embracing hybrid work must establish systems, policies, and training to account for proximity bias. As such, employers could consider the following strategies to combat proximity bias in the workplace:
Ignoring proximity bias doesn’t mean it simply goes away. Addressing and eliminating workplace proximity bias will require organizations to rethink how they approach remote and hybrid work.
As organizations trend toward remote and hybrid work, there is likely work to be done to ensure no favoritism for on-site employees. The first step to addressing proximity bias is understanding its dangerous impact on workplace culture and examples of how it occurs. With that in mind, organization leaders, supervisors, and employees can actively remove proximity bias in remote and hybrid workplaces. This can enable employees to succeed and stand out, no matter where they’re working from.
Contact us today for more information on flexible workplace management.
IMA will continue to monitor regulator guidance and offer meaningful, practical, timely information. This material should not be considered as a substitute for legal, tax and/or actuarial advice. Contact the appropriate professional counsel for such matters. These materials are not exhaustive and are subject to possible changes in applicable laws, rules, and regulations and their interpretations.