Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Temporarily Halts OSHA ETS
Nov 9, 2021
Numerous lawsuits have been filed across the country, including 27 state attorneys general, against OSHA’s new emergency temporary standard (ETS) applicable to most employers nationwide with 100+ employees. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals wasted no time in announcing right away that the ETS is temporarily “stayed” (or paused) nationwide while the Court asked the parties to submit briefs addressing what the Court believes may be “grave statutory and constitutional issues.” Later in the week on November 12, the Court affirmed the nationwide pause, citing the ETS as “overly broad.” We encourage employers to read the court order to learn the reasoning behind the stay, but the end result of their decision is the following order:
“Enforcement of the OSHA Covid-19 Vaccination & Testing Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) remains STAYED pending adequate judicial review of the petitioners’ underlying motions for a permanent injunction. In addition, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that OSHA take NO Steps to implement or enforce the Mandate until further court order.“
All of the petitions will be consolidated to one circuit chosen by lottery, which was scheduled to occur on Tuesday, November 16, 2021. The Sixth Circuit was chosen to review the matter.
IMA recommends that all employers continue to provide a safe workplace by following the federal recommendations for cleaning, reporting, paid time off, air ventilation, etc. The provisions below should continue to be pursued as much as is feasible:
OSHA has provided a guide for employers and employees to consider submitting public comments by December 5, 2021. There are specific elements they definitely want input on as they consider making these requirements permanent and potentially expand them to employers with fewer than 100 employees. Your voice related to feasibility, economic, and other impacts the mandates would have are greatly welcomed.
It’s also worth noting that the mandates on health care workers and federal contractors/subcontractors have also been challenged in court by numerous states. At this time, the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) is stating health care employers that “fit the industries identified” are to continue to implement the mandate applicable to them. We advise employers contact their attorney for further guidance.
IMA will continue to monitor regulator guidance and offer meaningful, practical, timely information.
This material should not be considered as a substitute for legal, tax and/or actuarial advice. Contact the appropriate professional counsel for such matters. These materials are not exhaustive and are subject to possible changes in applicable laws, rules, and regulations and their interpretations.