TAFT-HARTLEY

Strengthening your Fund: to protect families, businesses and plan offerings.

Consultative Philosophy/Approach: Our consultative approach is rooted in two foundational components: Being educational and informative so clients can make well-founded decisions, and following a strategic and active approach to plan management.

Educated and Informed Trustees Enable High Performing Plans

Are You Currently Receiving the Information You Need To Manage Your Plan

QUESTIONS TO ASK

Yourself and Broker

ASK YOURSELF:

  1. Do I feel informed and educated on our offerings?
  2. Do I know the current financial health of our offerings?
  3. Do I understand the cost drivers and market conditions driving our plan costs
  4. Do I feel empowered to make informed decisions?
  5. Am I presented options and am educated on those options to a degree to which I feel comfortable making an informed decision?
  6. Am I being advised on strategies to control costs and improve member benefits?
  7. Does my current broker measure and present results of past recommended strategies/decisions?

ASK YOUR BROKER/ACTUARY:

  1. Can you provide detailed information regarding the current and continued health/performance of our plan?
  2. Have you brought solutions to help control costs & improve benefits?
  3. Will you measure and report to us on the impact of your consultation/recommendations/strategic approach?
Annual

Service Plan

1st

General Update / Compliance

2nd

Strategy / Pre-Renewal

3rd

Renewal / Data Informed Decisions

4th

Implementation, Document Review, Open Enrollment Support
STRATEGIC, ACTIVE PLAN MANAGEMENT
STRATEGIC, ACTIVE PLAN MANAGEMENT
Plan

Components

FUNDING

Impact – Year 1 of Change
Plan Funding
Reserve Utilization

STRUCTURAL

Impact – Year 1 of Change
Network
Stop Loss Coverage
  • Specific Deductible
  • Lasers
  • Aggregate SL?
  • Contract terms
Plan Administration
  • UM/CM/DM/UR
  • Payment accuracy
PBM
  • Contract terms
  • Pricing
Budgeting

PLAN SET-UP

Impact – Longer Term, Future Spend Mitigation
Plan Design:

Deductible/Out of Pocket, Max/Coinsurance

  • Less efficient means of “savings”
Other Options
  • Value Base Plan Design,
  • Narrow Network,
  • Incent COE, Near-site Clinic
  • Clinic Arrangements with Local Providers
  • Direct Contracts
  • Etc
PLAN SET-UP:

SAMPLE MED/RX PLAN STRATEGIES

(Not an exhaustive list)

COST

STRUCTURAL: Year 1 impact, ongoing

Reference Based Pricing

Tiered & Narrow
Networks

Direct
Contracting

Unbundled Plan Administration

Cost
Transparency

CARE

RIGHT SERVICE, RIGHT PLACE: Future impact, ongoing

Onsite/Near site
Clinic

Condition
Management

Centers of
Excellence

Health Risk
Management

Plan
Design

EFFICIENCY

CONDITION MANAGEMENT: Future impact, ongoing

Pharmacy Management

Site of Service Differentials

Value Based Plan Design

Transparency Incentives

Patient
Advocacy

Proven Results

CASE STUDY –

PEPM MED/RX CLAIMS

~400 Member Taft Hartley Fund. Plan facing insolvency when IMA Was hired.

CASE

STUDY – 400EE

Incremental Strategies, Ongoing Savings First 2 Years Savings/Cost Avoidance:
structural PHARMACY OPTIMIZATION $160,882
RISK MANAGEMENT – SPECIFIC STOP LOSS $78,000
PLA SET-UP POPULATION MANAGEMENT $725,000
ANCILLARY MANGEMENT $185,000